Search for: All records

Abstract The expression of genomically-encoded information is not error-free. Transcript-error rates are dramatically higher than DNA-level mutation rates, and despite their transient nature, the steady-state load of such errors must impose some burden on cellular performance. However, a broad perspective on the degree to which transcript-error rates are constrained by natural selection and diverge among lineages remains to be developed. Here, we present a genome-wide analysis of transcript-error rates across the Tree of Life using a modified rolling-circle sequencing method, revealing that the range in error rates is remarkably narrow across diverse species. Transcript errors tend to be randomly distributed, with little evidence supporting local control of error rates associated with gene-expression levels. A majority of transcript errors result in missense errors if translated, and as with a fraction of nonsense transcript errors, these are underrepresented relative to random expectations, suggesting the existence of mechanisms for purging some such errors. To quantitatively understand how natural selection and random genetic drift might shape transcript-error rates across species, we present a model based on cell biology and population genetics, incorporating information on cell volume, proteome size, average degree of exposure of individual errors, and effective population size. However, while this model provides a framework for understanding the evolution of this highly conserved trait, as currently structured it explains only 20% of the variation in the data, suggesting a need for further theoretical work in this area. 

To determine the error rate of transcription in human cells, we analyzed the transcriptome of H1 human embryonic stem cells with a circle-sequencing approach that allows for high-fidelity sequencing of the transcriptome. These experiments identified approximately 100,000 errors distributed over every major RNA species in human cells. Our results indicate that different RNA species display different error rates, suggesting that human cells prioritize the fidelity of some RNAs over others. Cross-referencing the errors that we detected with various genetic and epigenetic features of the human genome revealed that the in vivo error rate in human cells changes along the length of a transcript and is further modified by genetic context, repetitive elements, epigenetic markers, and the speed of transcription. Our experiments further suggest that BRCA1, a DNA repair protein implicated in breast cancer, has a previously unknown role in the suppression of transcription errors. Finally, we analyzed the distribution of transcription errors in multiple tissues of a new mouse model and found that they occur preferentially in neurons, compared to other cell types. These observations lend additional weight to the idea that transcription errors play a key role in the progression of various neurological disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease.